PDF File here
Revised November 2009
Platform Speeches
Illustrated Oratory
An illustrated oratory is an original platform speech which informs or explains a particular topic with the use of visual aids.
Original Oratory
An original oratory is an original speech given on any topic the speaker chooses.
Persuasive Speech
A persuasive speech is an original speech intended to persuade the audience to adopt a particular point of view or course of action.
Interpretive Speeches
Dramatic Interpretation
A dramatic interpretation creatively explores and develops the intellectual, emotional, and artistic embodiment of one work of literature for performance.
Duo Interpretation
A duo interpretation creatively explores and develops the intellectual, emotional, and artistic embodiment of one work of literature for dual performance
Humorous Interpretation
A humorous interpretation creatively explores and develops the intellectual, emotional, and artistic embodiment of one work of literature for performance.
Thematic Interpretation
A Thematic Interpretation presents prose and/or poetry from more than one source, woven together around a common theme.
Limited Preparation Speeches
Apologetics
Apologetics is a limited preparation event in which the speaker is given four minutes to prepare a six-minute speech on a topic related to defending his/her faith.
Extemporaneous Speaking
Extemporaneous speaking is a limited preparation event where the speaker is given thirty minutes to prepare a seven-minute speech on a current event topic.
Impromptu Speaking
Impromptu is a limited preparation speech in which the speaker is given two minutes to prepare a five-minute speech on a randomly drawn topic.
Debate
Team Policy Debate
In policy debate, competitors either advocate or oppose a resolution that calls for a change in policy regarding a current political issue. The 2009-10 policy debate topic is “Resolved: That the United States Federal Government should significantly reform its environmental policy.” During a round of debate, a team of two debaters will advocate the resolution by proposing a specific plan to accomplish the goal stated in the resolution while another team of two debaters will oppose the resolution and the specific plan of the first team. In a debate tournament, each team will take turns advocating and opposing the resolution in a series of different rounds so that competitors thoroughly learn all the issues involved in the debate as well as the skills to either advocate or oppose a proposition.
NCFCA debate encourages a conversational style of debate and utilizes judges from the community (as well as debate coaches and teachers) in order to ensure that competitors learn how to communicate to a general audience.
Lincoln Douglas Debate
Lincoln Douglas debate is similar to policy debate in that competitors will take turns advocating or opposing a resolution throughout a series of rounds during a tournament. However, the Lincoln Douglas debate format in one-on-one debating, named after the famous debates between Stephen Douglas and Abraham Lincoln.
Although Douglas and Lincoln debated matters of policy, the core of their advocacy always involved a clash of values. Thus, in NCFCA, Lincoln Douglas debate resolutions are always constructed to create a clash of competing values rather than the adoption of a specific policy. The 2009-10 Lincoln Douglas debate topic is “Resolved: That competition is superior to cooperation as a means of achieving excellence.” Rather than arguing about a specific course of action the government should take, Lincoln Douglas debaters look at the values that always underlie policy decisions.